Smoking in Public Places
There are certain things which are absolutely disliked in public places. Pointing fingers at others is one and smoking is another. During this study, we aim to explore the finer points related with smoking and how it creates a sense of animosity amongst the different people – by all means and measures. It is believed that smoking in public places is generally a very bad thing to do, the reason being that a lot of passive inhaling is done on the part of the people who are actually not anywhere close to a smoke. This creates upheaval amongst such people and they start detesting the very fact that they are being let down by the smoker community.
One should believe that smoking in public places creates rifts. It makes the people disillusioned with the fact that they are being treated in a very sordid manner. The smokers must not be allowed to let it be, they need to be taken to task, for the negativity that they inflict upon other people. The reason for understanding this phenomenon is that smoking in public places is generally not a very viable exercise and could succumb into different kinds of fights, rage attacks and so on. The people who usually smoke at such dispositions are either unaware of the harmful effects that they are causing to the environment around them or are very prone to what usually happens once they smoke in a public domain. (Spivey, 2006) Smoking usually comes out as a force which unbinds the people. It creates issues amongst them without even coming at vocal terms with one another. These issues could mean simple nagging complaints to verbal brawls, and sometimes even forceful rivalries. Thus smoking in public places is usually considered very degrading and humiliating for one and all and not just the people who are getting affected due to the passive smoke which is coming for their harm. The arguments which are raised by different quarters include the fact that smoking is a very private affair and one must not comment on something to this effect at all. This is a pretty debatable point since smoking in public places means negativities attached for one and all. And there are no areas of respite. The arguments thus generally center on the premise of harmful instigation which could be caused for the worsening sake of the people at large. (Robbins, 2003)
In essence, smoking in public places is fatal for the lives of one and all. It is an element of disaster as far as cordiality and oneness amongst people is concerned. It makes them feel awkward and helpless, all at the same time. Thus smoking in public places paints a very gloomy picture of how things actually shape up in the long run. It is essentially intolerable to have a person in one’s close proximity who is a die-hard chain smoker and who would be unwilling to give up on his bad habit within a public space. This man would be criticized for his acts and at times, taunts would also make the rounds of his personality.
Robbins, Leslie. Balancing Smokers, Nonsmokers and Health Concerns: Delaware and California Have Banned All Public Smoking. Other States Are Looking at Requiring Separate, Well-Vented Rooms. the Problem Is No One Knows How Much Ventilation Is Enough. State Legislatures, Vol. 29, January 2003
Spivey, Angela. The Public Health Payoff of “No Smoking Allowed”: Quantifying Decreases in SHS Exposure. Environmental Health Perspectives, Vol. 114, 2006
Word Count: 521
Now You Order Yours Too
You probably have read the comments of our past clients. Thanks to the professionalism of our writers and support staff, our service has been so satisfying for them that we proudly share their feedback with everyone on our website. We have tons of college research papers for sale, and you need one; so why wait? Chat with our customer support.
Useful study materials: https://essays.io/dissertation-methodology-examples-samples/